This is the "What & Why" page of the "Preemption Checking for Law Reviews & Journals" guide.
Alternate Page for Screenreader Users
Skip to Page Navigation
Skip to Page Content
School of Law

Preemption Checking for Law Reviews & Journals   Tags: editing law review articles, preemption checking, writing law review articles, writing papers, writing requirement  

Make sure your note, comment, or article is sufficiently original to be published; use this guide to walk through your search for similar scholarship.
Last Updated: Mar 1, 2016 URL: Print Guide RSS Updates

What & Why Print Page

Preemption Checking at a Glance — Checklist

This brief checklist summarizes the essential steps and sources for a successful preemption check.


What Is a Preemption Check?

A preemption check involves searching to see whether someone else has already written an article that: is on the same topic you would like to write your article on; develops the same thesis you would like to develop; and has the same focus your article would have. During the process you will likely find articles that also address your topic. But don't conclude you are preempted unless after reading those articles you find that you have no new, worthwhile insights to offer.

This guide covers preemption step by step, and in detail. For an overview of the process, see Preemption Checking at a Glance, available in the box on the left.

For more practice in the art of preemption checking, sign on to CALI and run the Preemption Checking CALI Exercise.


Why Is It Important?

Law reviews and journals use originality as one criterion to decide if an article is worthy of publication. The goal of a preemption check is to establish that your article, comment, or note is original — that it will add something to the scholarly discussion of your topic.


What Are the Main Steps?

For a thorough preemption check, take the following steps:

  1. Search for legal articles using legal article indexes.

  2. Search for legal articles — including working papers — using full-text sources for legal articles.

  3. Search for non-legal articles if your topic has an interdisciplinary slant.

  4. Search for books and book chapters.

  5. Set up alerts to keep current on newly-published articles.

At each stage use a variety of sources and a variety of search techniques. The more sources and search techniques you use, the more confident you can be that you have found all of the articles related to your topic, and that you have not overlooked a preempting article.

Keep a log of the sources you checked and the searches you did, so that you don't accidentally skip a step — or repeat a step unnecessarily.


Why So Many Steps?

Preemption checks involve the daunting task of trying to prove the negative. You need to be able to claim confidently that no other article quite like yours exists. You cannot say "there is no article like this" until you have checked everywhere that similar articles might be found, using every resource that exists for finding law review articles and using different types of searches. So, preemption checking requires an usual degree of thoroughness, and a tolerance for a certain amount of tedium

The payoff for the painstaking work of preemption checking is twofold. First, you can be reassured that you will not spend months researching and writing an article that cannot be published. Second, you will come away with a portfolio of articles that will help you refine and research your topic.


What Types of Searches Should I Use?

Preemption checking is about trying to find every article on your topic, not just a few good articles. To come close to finding everything, you need to use multiple tools and multiple search strategies.

In any given source/database, the more different types of searches you run, the more confident you can be that you have found any potentially preempting articles.

These are the major search options —

  • Keyword — terms and connectors (in both full-text databases and in indexes)
  • Keyword — natural language (also in both full-text databases and in indexes). Natural language searches are never enough by themselves, but when used with other types of searches, they can help identify relevant, recent articles that cite to previous scholarship.
  • Subject / Descriptor searches (in indexes)
  • Case Name (in indexes)
  • Statute Name (in indexes)

Am I Preempted? How Can I Tell?

Suppose you find an article very similar to the one you propose to write. Are you preempted? This is a hard question to answer.

Ask yourself — is there anything at all left to say on this topic? Are their new angles to explore? Can I craft a novel thesis?

Ask an editor or professor. Others may have a more objective view of whether your approach is sufficiently original to merit publication.

Check the following book. Chapter 2 ("Inspiration: Choosing a  Subject & Developing a Thesis") has great advice on strategies for close reading of other articles to tease out original and meaningful theses for your own article.

Cover Art
Scholarly Writing for Law Students: Seminar Papers, Law Review Notes, and Law Review Competition Papers, 4th ed. - Elizabeth Fajans & Mary R. Falk
Call Number: KF 250 .F35 2011 Law Open Reserve & Law Reserve
Publication Date: 2011
Chapter 2, "Inspiration: Choosing a Subject & Developing a Thesis," is particularly useful. (Also available from the West Academic.)

Research Librarian

Profile Image
Lee Ryan
Logo - LinkedInLogo - Twitter
Contact Info
Zief Law Library, Rm. 103
Send Email
School of Law | 2130 Fulton Street | San Francisco, CA 94117-1080 | (415) 422-6307

Loading  Loading...